St Louis Lending Community Wonders If HAMP Will Stop Foreclosures
With the numerous reported failures of the federal program known as HAMP, inside senior officials seem to be jumping on the band wagon sharing their...
With the numerous reported failures of the federal program known as HAMP, inside senior officials seem to be jumping on the band wagon sharing their new found pessimistic viewpoints on where this program may be headed.
There were letters recently exchanged between one key senator and Neil Barofsky, special inspector general for the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), on the subject of HAMP with Barofsky saying that only 1.5 million or so homeowners would get any type of mortgage assistance.
Compare this to the 4 million it initially claimed, even if this new number of permanent loan modifications could be accomplished at this point seems to be only a miracle.
The actual statistics may be surprising but only 200,000 homeowners have been able to go from their trial modification to a permanent loan status.
But if matters couldn’t be worse, the inspector general’s report warned that many borrowers are at risk of re-defaulting on their St Louis mortgages even after receiving help under the federal program.
Again the critics are coming out of the wood works suggesting that these homeowners are irresponsible. But the truth of the matter is, many still owe more money than what their home is worth not mentioning that others have second mortgages.
The detestable statistics that will be briefly mentioned may be those thousands of homeowners who were indeed irresponsible to the point of buying homes they knew they couldn’t afford. And what is worse is the multitude of consumers who blatantly lied on their applications when it came to the now infamous stated income loans or what others call “liar loans.” These are the very one who helped create this mortgage fiasco alongside the insurance and banking behemoths.
Getting back to the matter at hand, Barofsky then shows his further skepticism basically saying that these loan modifications may not be the best program to continue offering. The Treasury department had other opinions as to the wide spread criticism.
In a long, drawn out response included in the report, Herbert M. Allison, assistant Treasury secretary for financial stability said the program “should be measured by how many eligible homeowners are able to avoid the pain and stigma of foreclosure by reducing their mortgage payments to affordable levels while either remaining in their homes or transitioning with dignity to more suitable housing. The number of permanent modifications is one element, but not the only element of gauging the success.”
The approach here seems to be to make an excuse or perhaps help us to see how this program should actually be viewed and decided as regards its ultimate success or failure.
What Allison, in reality, was saying is that the problem is not in the failing of HAMP, but rather that Barofsky and other critics are not measuring its lack of success the correct way. Oh, really.
But the Treasury department along with Allison cannot fully believe this concept since he goes on to say that permanent modifications are really only one way to help struggling homeowners.
The fact that servicers offering other foreclosure prevention initiatives and alternatives such as short sales must be taken into consideration.
The bottom line to all this was that the administration sold the American consumer on the fact that HAMP was going to be the ultimate savior in stopping foreclosures and steering this country back on course to a full recovery.
And as we are finding out, many of these modifications did not include a realistic principal reduction, which means in all likelihood, it will fail.
If you are wanting to discuss some of the best home loan options on a or a loan, visit our websites or call Floyd, Steve or Doug at 877-334-0210 or 314-334-0210.